A few weeks ago, I posted some questions about poster presentations at philosophy conferences. Now that RoME 2012 has finished, I think it'd be useful for me to share what I learned at the conference (beyond what was already mentioned in the comments on my previous post).

First, my poster definitely had too much information, even though I had tried to avoid this. One professor told me a good rule of thumb is to keep the word count of a poster to no higher than 800 (although he admitted to violating this rule with his own poster). To have a poster with only 800 words at the approximate dimensions the conference advised (38" x 46"), I suspect body text would have to be around 32-point font. (Mine was only 24-point.)

Second, about half the presenters had their posters laminated. I didn't. Even though it would have cost a bit more, I think it would have been worth the investment: it looks better, and your poster won't take nearly as much damage during the conference (from being mounted/dismounted, rolled/unrolled, etc.).

Third, it was definitely a good idea to have a handout for these sessions. A few people opted to read the handout rather than the poster, and since only a few people can huddle around a poster at once without impairing one another's vision, handouts can keep interested parties (who can't see your poster well) from being drawn to other posters.

I suspect I'll do better at making a compelling poster if/when I get another chance at putting one together.

Posted in

2 responses to “Poster Presentations Revisited”

  1. Marcus Arvan

    Trevor: for what it is worth, I thought your poster was great. Although I think handouts are great (I certainly spent time reading them), aside from that I think substance trumps style. Cool-looking, laminated posters may initially attract attention, but I for one spent most of my time at posters I found interesting, whether they looked good or not — and I suspect most other philosophers do the same. In fact, I recall spending most of my time at posters that didn’t look good, for the simple reason that I found their content more interesting! Anyway, good work, and a pleasure meeting you at RoME!

  2. Thanks, Marcus. I should clarify that I’m not advocating superficiality or style in place of substance, but looking back, I think I could have made the poster more accessible and easier to read without sacrificing very much in the way of content. Intuitively, I’d think that most philosophers would prefer posters with interesting content rather than merely an interesting appearance, but that certainly doesn’t mean one can’t aspire to do both.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading