“A
degree in philosophy? What are you going to do with that then?”
This is probably part of the motivation behind many philosophy
departments’ attempts, such
as this one, to emphasize the value of philosophy.
In an attempt to show students the value of philosophy, I have
adopted a skills-based approach to my teaching. That is, I try to teach
students how to think, not what to think. I not only tell but also show
them why thinking critically and philosophically is one of the most important
things they will ever learn in college. For an example of the kind of
activities I do with my students in class, see this piece from the Fall 2011 issue
of the APA Newsletter on Teaching
Philosophy.
To gauge my success, I ask my students to fill out
evaluation surveys throughout the semester and, at the end of the semester, I ask
them the following question: Are you
taking something of lasting value from this class? If so, what? If not, why
not?
I have promised my students complete confidentiality, which
is why I will not mention specific responses here. But the responses are
overwhelmingly positive. Students frequently mention how their critical
thinking skills have improved and that such skills are valuable and applicable
in many domains other than philosophy.
All of this brings me to the questions I would like to ask
you, my fellow pupae. First, do you take a similar approach to your teaching? If so,
why? If not, why not?
Second, in these hard times, in which philosophy
departments are threatened with cuts, why is it that philosophers (the APA,
perhaps) are not actively making the case for philosophy as the major discipline
that trains students to think? Or is it that they are making this case but
nobody wants to listen?
Leave a Reply to Michel X.Cancel reply