We all know how difficult it is to get undergraduates to write good papers. I've come across one directive that I've found works like a charm, and thought I would share it with you all. In my experience, of all the bad habits it is difficult to get undergraduates to break, it is the practice of "having their mind made up" about their thesis and trying to "defend" it all costs, regardless of whether their argument is absolutely terrible. Oftentimes, this results in them just stating their opinion. (I assume readers have had this experience. Am I right?).

Anyway, here's something I stumbled on a while back: tell students not to go into the paper with a thesis, but instead regard writing the paper as a process of discovering their thesis. Here's what I tell them: 

  • Figure out which course topic interests you.
  • Summarize whatever argument on that topic you are most interested in, but feel there's something wrong with.
  • Write out the best objections you can to the argument.
  • Write out the best replies you can to those objections.
  • Keep reasoning through both the objections and replies until you make a case to your reader for one conclusion or another.
  • It's only at that point that you know what your thesis is, and it is only then that you should go back and write your introduction, stating your thesis.

Again, it's not foolproof, but I find it really works. It prevents students from doing what comes most naturally to them: simply stating their opinion. It gets them to "forget" about what they want to argue and instead see where the arguments lead! And that is a good thing. 🙂

Posted in

2 responses to “A Teaching Strategy”

  1. Rachel

    This is roughly exactly how I’ve structured my writing assignments in the past. I break it down into three parts: summarize one central argument from the relevant readings; offer one powerful objection to that argument (doesn’t have to be the student’s own, but it can be and often is); adjudicate between the two views (which is the strongest)? The structure helps them, too.

  2. Yes! This is a big problem! (Incidentally, I don’t think it stops with undergrads….)
    One useful resource here is Anthony Weston’s Rulebook for Arguments. Chapters 6-8 provide a useful guide to the process of writing a paper. It’s cheap enough (less than $10) to require as a secondary textbook, too. (Full disclosure: Anthony and I have a full-length critical thinking textbook based on his Ruleboo, so I’m not quite a neutral party. But his Rulebook is enough to communicate the basic process, and when I used his textbook to teach courses, students regularly said that they wished they’d learned about the process sooner.)

Leave a Reply to RachelCancel reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading