It's been an absurdly long time since the last post in this series (which I didn't even write). So it's time to get these posts back in gear.

Recently, Marcus highlighted a blog post by Mike Labossiere where Mike advised readers not to try to become a university professor. One of the reasons he gives for holding this view is the finding that professors work (on average) about 61 hours per week. The study from which this data originates has its limitations. This statistic is derived from the reports of 30 faculty members at Boise State University collected over the course of 166 days. Even so, it is a rather staggering number, and I know faculty and graduate students alike who claim to routinely work 60-70 hours per week.

I had one semester early in my graduate career where my average work hours probably averaged more than 60 per week. Although I survived the experience, I never want to repeat it. Once the semester concluded, I made a concerted effort to limit the amount of work I did each week. This has not always been easy: the temptation to work 60+ hours per week can be a strong one. Even as a graduate student, there is a seemingly endless list of things that one could be doing at any given time – an additional piece of teaching material to prepare, an old term paper to revise, a dissertation prospectus to write, or a pertinent article waiting to be read.

But in my experience, it's just bad to work 60+ hours per week. It's a recipe for fatigue, dissatisfaction, and (often) burnout. So I think it's worth having some rules in place that limit the extent to which one works in a given week. Elsewhere, Marcus has mentioned two such rules:

  1. Do not work after 6:00 pm.
  2. Do not work on weekends.

In the comments of the same post, Rachel proposed similar set of rules:

  1. Do not work after 4:00 pm.
  2. Do not work on weekends.
  3. Take vacations from time to time.
  4. Do not work more than 35 hours per week.

My own rules overlap a bit with theirs:

  1. Refrain from working for at least 1 full day per week.
  2. Take at least 2 vacations per year that are longer than 2 weeks.
  3. Do no more than 6 hours of focused work per day.
  4. Sleep for 8 hours every night.

I have not found a way to consistently purge weekend work from my week, but rule #1 at least grants one day off every week. (This day is usually Saturday.) Rule #2 is pretty straightforward, and I've touched on the importance of vacations in an earlier post in this series. Rules #3 and #4 require a little explanation.

Rule #3 is designed to limit the amount of intense work that I do per day. By "focused" work, I have the following things in mind: reading difficult philosophical work, writing papers, grading papers, teaching classes, and anything else that requires my sustained, focused attention to be done well. I can really only do these tasks for a maximum of about 6 hours per day before the quality of my work starts to plummet. This does not mean that I only work 6 hours per day: tasks that require less cognitive energy (e.g., replying to emails, reading blogs, updating the Blackboard site for my course) are not covered by this rule.

The main function of Rule #4 is to ensure that I can follow Rules #1-3 and still meet all of my commitments. I cannot conduct proper research, write well, or teach well when I am tired. Even one evening of 6 hours of sleep will ultimately derail me the next day because I will tire earlier than usual: I may only be able to get 4 hours of focused work done that day. Thus, of all the rules I listed, this is the one I am least likely to break.

Of course, this is just a small sampling of some general rules that a few of us have adopted to try to avoid the 61-hour work week. What other rules do you all follow to limit your weekly work hours to a manageable number?

Posted in

6 responses to “Balance Series, Part 5: Avoiding the 61-Hour Work Week”

  1. Hi Trevor: I totally agree on the sleep thing. A consistent 8 hours of sleep does absolute wonders all around–for mood, motivation, mental clarity, etc.

  2. Hi Trevor, I am not sure I am following. In the linked post, you spoke of taking holidays of max. 2 weeks. Here you seem to imply that they should be at least 2 weeks long, or am I misunderstanding something?
    Anyway, as you rightly point out, one has to discover one’s own rules and there is no one-size-fits-all kind of rules. As for me, I work 8 hours per day, between 8.30 to 5 pm and then have a long break dedicated to family. I may still answer some emails or the like at home or over the weekend, but I do not (manage to) do anything substantive. While on holiday, I am rigorously off-line (all my colleagues know about it and are informed in advance) and it is a great feeling to know that I cannot be reached by people who think their problems are urgent.

  3. Hi, Elisa. Thanks for your comment. After giving the old post a reread, I can see how the two posts look like they might be in tension with one another, so let me clarify.
    In part of that older post, I was thinking about the problem of taking too much time away from philosophy. In my own experience, more than 2 weeks away without doing any philosophy can make it pretty tough to get back into the routine of research and teaching when the next semester arrives. So I suggested the following general rule: “never totally disconnect from philosophy for more than 2 weeks.” This rule isn’t inconsistent with taking longer vacations, but it does imply that when my vacation lasts more than 2 weeks, I try to start squeezing a little research or teaching prep into my daily routine – not a lot but enough so that I don’t start to get rusty. To give an example, my upcoming vacation on winter break will last about 3 weeks. I expect to do very little (if any) philosophy those first 2 weeks, but I plan to start prepping my course for next semester when week 3 of my vacation begins.

  4. Fritz Allhoff

    Gosh, I would have thought 60 hours/week is a manageable number. Between publishing, teaching, administration, advising, grant work, etc., there’s just a ton of stuff to do. Plus the evening cut-offs just don’t work, e.g., for visiting speakers, department functions, etc.
    I have colleagues that I’m sure don’t work 20 hours/week, but the job really is what you make out of it. I’d be bored with a job that didn’t invite this kind of investment and certainly don’t think people should be scared off by it. But, again, people can fashion different sorts of lives out of the profession, including “taking it easy” and working shorter hours.
    I’d caution against ending at 4 and only working 35 hours/week, either of which might be in violation of labor contracts or state law (e.g., at public universities). I don’t think philosophy should be about doing less work; the work’s part of the fun.

  5. Thanks for sharing your perspective, Fritz. I imagine there are a significant number of philosophers who feel the same way. I certainly know a few who don’t seem to mind working for 60 hours a week. But for me, 60+ hours per week was more than I would want to consistently endure. I’m only conscious for 112 hours per week, and when I was devoting more than half those hours to philosophical work, I was always teetering on the edge of burnout. I also have not detected any perceptible decline in productivity when I work fewer hours per week. (I typically work around 50 per week.) I suspect this is because I can work more effectively when I am well-rested and in better spirits.

  6. Rachel McKinnon

    Very few schools have ‘residency’ requirements that one be at work for 40hrs/week. I suspect that’s what you’re referring to, Fritz. Otherwise, how can they possibly know how many hours a week one actually works? There’s no way to tell how much work someone does at home, at a coffee shop, at the dog park, etc. So I think the ‘state school labor contract’ worry is not a serious one unless one’s employer actually requires one be at work for 40hrs/week.

Leave a Reply to Fritz AllhoffCancel reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading