The Philosophers' Cocoon

A safe and supportive forum for philosophers.

Owned & Moderated by Marcus Arvan (University of Tampa)

Contact: marvan@ut.edu

Blog mission & moderation policy

IMPORTANT NOTE on how to ensure anonymity in commenting
Job-Market Reporting Thread (2025-26)
Job-Market Discussion Thread (2025-26)

recent posts

about

7 Years Later: An Introduction

By Trevor Hedberg

I spent a lot of time in graduate school digging up information about what I should expect during graduate school and what I should do to be competitive for academic employment when I finished my dissertation. Back then, information about these topics existed, but it was scattered across a random assemblage of online resources, and the the authors of these blog posts and short guides sometimes disagreed about the best methods for writing papers, finding a suitable work/life balance, teaching effectively, and so on. Things have definitely improved since that time. There are more avenues for graduate students to learn this information, and discussions of these topics have progressed enough that some points of consensus have emerged on these matters. But even now, the main thing I was looking for back in 2010 and 2011 has not been produced.

What I wanted as a graduate student was a single document that answered the many questions I had about graduate and professional life. How do I write a course syllabus? What is the proper conduct at academic conferences? How do I complete a revise-and-resubmit so that the paper gets published? How do I prepare for my first job search? You get the idea. And I did find answers to these questions eventually, but I wanted those answers all in one place and presented in a unified and cohesive voice. Ideally, this document would have also provided some additional resources related to the topics under discussion. The best I could find was typically a short guide that covered a small fraction of the relevant aspects of graduate school or focused on just one in particular (such as how to write publishable papers).

After a while, I decided it might be worth trying to write the guide that I had been unable to find as a graduate student. After working on it intermittently for many years, I am finally getting close to its completion. My plan is to release 7 Years Later: Surviving Graduate School in Philosophy sometime during the upcoming summer. The main title alludes to both the fact that 7 years is about the average length of time it takes a typical graduate student in the humanities to earn a PhD and the fact that my own time in graduate school (obtaining both an MA and PhD) took about 7 years. The broad framework for 7 Years has been outlined on my website for the last several months. Frankly, it has ballooned to a much larger size than I had originally envisioned: it may be about 60,000 words when it is complete.

Leading up to the guide’s full release, I’ll be publishing snippets of the guide here on the Philosophers’ Cocoon. Some of the guide’s content is based on blog posts I’ve written here in the past few years, but the content I will share in these snippets will be new. My hope is that I will get feedback on some of this content that I can then incorporate into the released version. I’m not sure yet how many of these snippets I will end up publishing here, but I’ll be starting with a few related to teaching as a graduate student. The first one of those will go up next week.

Posted in ,

9 responses to “7 Years Later: An Introduction”

  1. hmm

    Trevor
    I worry that 60,000 words may be too long to be useful. If the “book” is supposed to help someone decide whether to pursue such a career – someone finishing a BA – I think most people will think it will be easier to just apply and see what happens than to read a book 60,000 words long, that will inevitably talk about things one cannot understand (because one is not yet in the system).

    Reply
  2. Marcus Arvan

    @hmm: I don’t know. I sure wish I had a resource like this when I was applying to grad school (and later working through grad school, making all kinds of mistakes that a guide like this might help someone avoid!).
    Sure, not everyone might be interested in reading 60,000 words, but I suspect that many people might (I myself knew more than a few grad students who probably would have benefitted greatly from a guide like this). I think this is a real service to the profession by Trevor, and I’m excited he’ll be sharing it here.

    Reply
  3. hmm again

    Marcus
    My concern is with 60,000 words, not the idea of a guide. To create something that people will not use until it is too late is a bit odd. I worked in advertising in the past – you have to know your audience

    Reply
  4. Trevor Hedberg

    A few quick comments based on the exchange above. First, this guide isn’t primarily about how to apply to graduate school or whether to apply to graduate school in the first place. That is covered briefly in an appendix, which could stand alone as its own document. The guide is about how to complete graduate school in philosophy while also accomplishing what’s necessary to be competitive on the job market (to the extent that is possible with the way things currently are). The primary audience includes current graduate students — not just prospective graduate students.
    Second, I have gotten email inquiries over the last year from undergraduate students (with whom I have no affiliation) who have stumbled upon my website asking when the guide will be completed. So there are at least some prospective graduate students who would be interested in a guide like this.
    Third, the particular sections are meant to be self-contained, so you wouldn’t have to read the whole guide to understand a particular segment. To give one example, imagine you want some advice on teaching your own course for the first time. You could just read the section of the guide that addresses that issue. Or perhaps you’re getting close to writing your dissertation and want to know what that experience will be like. Then you could just jump to that section. I highly doubt most people using this guide will read every word that’s written, and it will be organized to facilitate that.

    Reply
  5. Caligula’s Goat

    As a book / guide that is far too long for its intended usage. It might make more sense to create a website that has nested pages (like a wiki) so that people can zoom into all and only the information they’re looking for then and there.
    Even with the shift in vehicle, that’s probably still too much content for a guide intended for undergrads. Karen Kelsky’s book is probably around that length though her target audience is much older than undergraduates tend to be and includes people who have spent a lot of time picking up efficient reading/skimming skills so it makes more sense.

    Reply
  6. Trevor Hedberg

    Caligula’s Goat — The guide will be hosted online. Probably not in the format of a wiki but using an elaborate linked table of contents (where you click where you want to go).
    This guide isn’t aimed exclusively (or even primarily) at undergrads, though it could be of use to them. I expect those currently in graduate school to be those who would be most interested in the material.

    Reply
  7. Michael

    Looking at the outline on Trevor’s website, I’m not sure I follow the concerns. First, this is clearly not solely a guide for undergraduates. The dissertation, Obstacles to finishing graduate school, and leaving academic, for example, have a more limited audience. Second, we’re talking about 60,000 words for an 18 part document. On average, they’re going to be just over 3k words each. As self-contained bits of advice on different stages of the process of thinking through (and then working through) graduate school, this is from from overwhelming. And third, even if this is not clearly indexed and/or chaptered, we live in the age of fully searchable texts. Students can look for what is currently troubling them even if they don’t want to read a full how-to guide for grad school.

    Reply
  8. Early career

    I’ve read every single post about how to do well in the job market on this blog and there has never been a single point in time where I thought, this is too much to read, I wish the author could say less! On the contrary, I always find myself craving for more.
    My point being, while 60,000 words might sound daunting at first, if the information is useful and covers a wide range of issues (as I am sure it will be judging by the author’s description and past posts), readers would only have wanted it to go longer.
    Looking forward to seeing that manuscript!

    Reply
  9. Former Chair

    Fwiw, the length would not have stopped me from getting a book like this. I bought “Getting What You Came For” — 416 pages — and didn’t regret it.
    This is not an endorsement of GWYCF. I finished my PhD in 2006. I don’t know if the book has been updated since then.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading