In our newest "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

How much do small grammatical mistakes cost you in your job application materials? I ask because when I tweak my materials for particular jobs, I'm prone to making small mistakes. Are these forgivable in the eyes of a committee, or do they provide reason for tossing an app? I want to know how much attention I need to give to proofing and re-proofing each and every document prior to sending them off!

I'm not the best proof-reader myself, and I suspect if there's just a stray error or two, it won't be too big of a deal. But if your application materials are rife with editing errors, I suspect that probably will count against you. One reader submitted a response that basically agrees with this:

Grammatical mistakes and small typos aren't great, but now that we require applicants to produce so many documents, every application has them. Don't get sloppy and unprofessional, but as long as you're within a normal range, no one will toss your application for this reason.

But another reader noted that some people might be sticklers on this kind of stuff:

First, some people do care about small grammatical mistakes – I had a colleague who would really hold it against applicants. And given the great number of applicants, it was difficult to want to fight with her over an applicant who had a sloppy letter. Further, a central part of our trade is publishing, and if you are not catching errors in application letters, you are probably not going to catch them in your proofs for publications. "Big deal" … perhaps. But it does make you look careless. I would recommend applying for fewer positions, and taking more time with each application.

Anyway, it would be good to hear from other search committee members. How big of a deal is this to you?

Posted in

8 responses to “Grammatical mistakes in job apps?”

  1. Michel

    Don’t sweat it as long as it’s only one or two.
    You can’t please everyone, but those who hold something that petty against you will always find something. In fact, on the old Smoker blog, it turned out someone held it against candidates if they mixed up their salad and dinner forks. No joke.
    Besides, the people who care that much about something so insignificant are probably being hypocritical.

  2. grammer lovar

    Purely anecdotal, but a few years back, someone came and gave a job talk to my former department (with an unranked PhD program) with PowerPoint slides that included an appalling number of typos, like at least three per slide and including some very common words (and the candidate was a native English speaker).
    They got the job. Go figure.
    PS: Michel’s thing above about the salad and dinner forks is hilarious. Philosophers can be such a stodgy bunch.

  3. I suspect many typos are not even noticed given the sheer volume of material that search committees must examine. (Some, like a missing preposition, are naturally “read” by the brain to include the missing text.) Obviously, you want your documents to be as polished as possible, but with so many other more important things to worry about with regard to job market preparation, this is probably one of the least significant concerns one could have. The only caveat is that I could imagine a person having enough grammatical errors to hinder the clarity of their writing — but if that’s the case, there are bigger problems with the application materials than just typos.

  4. Felice B.

    Some people have dyslexia and can’t help but have a ton of typos. If I see a lot of typos in a text, I always assume it’s dyslexia, and I ignore the typos. If I see one or two mistakes, these are honest mistakes. If I see more than that but not a lot, I start thinking that the person is careless and doesn’t re-read their texts.

  5. AI to the rescue

    I think this is hard to say…and it can factor into the overall judgment in a tricky way. Better to use chatgpt or something to check the grammar…

  6. Circe

    As an aside, I used to make a ton of typos in all my writing. Nothing seemed to help, e.g., reading aloud, reading from the last sentence backwards. One day a colleague told me about the text-to-speech function in Word. Completely revolutionary. Now I can listen to my document being read out and catch typos instantly.

  7. Tom

    Maybe this is for a separate post, but is using chatgpt (or similar) to check grammar/for typos etc something others have done or experimented with? And if so, what prompts work best?

  8. Assc prof

    Typos per se don’t bother me, unless there’s a huge number. But if your confusing words and there homophones, than its a bigger issue.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading