The Philosophers' Cocoon

A safe and supportive forum for philosophers.

Owned & Moderated by Marcus Arvan (University of Tampa)

Contact: marvan@ut.edu

Blog mission & moderation policy

IMPORTANT NOTE on how to ensure anonymity in commenting
Job-Market Reporting Thread (2025-26)
Job-Market Discussion Thread (2025-26)

recent posts

about

How are “collected/published papers” dissertations viewed on the market?

In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

How are 'collected/published papers' dissertations perceived on the academic job market, whether for postdocs or TT jobs?

The trend toward "collected papers" option for dissertations appears to have started way back in the early 2000s when I was a grad student. When I started grad school, the expectation was that a dissertation should essentially be a book. But, as programs became more concerned with ensuring that grad students successfully complete the PhD and do so in a reasonable amount of time, I saw a pronounced shift toward the collected papers approach. Given how common this is today, I suspect hardly any bats an eyelash toward it, so to speak. But, as I've always understood it, "collected papers" dissertations have generally been expected to comprise a coherent research program, rather than simply be a collection of disconnected papers. Is there now a "published papers" option that sets that expectation aside? If so, I do wonder whether it might be an issue on the market, as hiring committees may want some assurance that candidates have a coherent research program.

What do readers think, particular those who are more "in the know" that I am?

Posted in ,

4 responses to “How are “collected/published papers” dissertations viewed on the market?”

  1. a collector

    I did a “collection of papers” on a theme PhD dissertation in 1997. It was commonplace in my department. We were strong in philosophy of science, and mimicked the sciences in that respect. It was certainly a useful way to break into publishing papers – each chapter was a paper. And I managed to publish four of them. And, these days, so much weight is put on whether a job applicant has publications that I do not think people look with great care at the dissertation (as a whole). Clearly, you have to make sure your supervisor supports such an approach.

    Reply
  2. TT

    This question presumes that dissertations are viewed in any way on the job market. They aren’t, lol.
    The dissertation only exists so that you can (1) tell plausible lies about what is in the dissertation and (2) get a few papers. Nobody except your advisor will read your dissertation. Certainly your committee members will not read the whole thing. Nobody on any search committee will care about what the structure or format of the dissertation is, as long as it is (i) COMPLETE and (ii) shows that you have an interesting research topic. But again — see above — you are permitted to tell plausible lies about both (i) and (ii).
    I don’t mean for this to sound cynical — in fact I mean for it to be helpful and somewhat freeing. Caring so much about the dissertation qua dissertation is very much a grad student thing to care about, and once you have even 2-3 months distance from the dissertation, you’ll realize that it doesn’t matter very much at all.

    Reply
  3. Mike Titelbaum

    TT forgot one purpose of the dissertation: Your advisors need to be able to describe its contents in their letters.
    More generally: When I was in graduate school, it was explained to me that the purpose of a unified dissertation was to demonstrate that you were capable of deep, sustained exploration of a particular topic at that kind of length. That is no longer seen as a requirement for a tenure-track job at most elite institutions. However, when I am reading job files, I am still looking at a candidate’s overall long-term research plan/trajectory. If the dissertation precis describes a loose collection of unrelated papers, I am going to look elsewhere in the file (especially at the research statement) to assess whether a broader research theme exists. I want to come away from the file with an answer to the question, “What does this candidate do? What are they interested in?”

    Reply
  4. Michel

    I don’t think anyone would ever know, unless you made a point of telling them.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Mike TitelbaumCancel reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading