In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:
I'm a junior grad student, planning to give a talk about the philosophy of a prominent political philosopher. I emailed him to get feedback on my talk notes, which was critical of his position. He responded with some helpful comments, which I appreciated. But he also seemed to think my own position could be seen as cruel to certain minorities and insensitive of their concerns/problems, and urged me to rethink it. Of course I was horrified, since the theory I suggested was meant to help that very minority. Needless to say I quickly rewrote my paper to make it much clearer that I wasn't advocating for anything bad, since I evidently didn't make it clear enough. But now I am worried that he will think of me badly and remember my name in that context, and since he's prominent in the field, I worry word will get around and I'll have a bad reputation. Am I overthinking this?
I'm optimistic the OP is overthinking it, but if they are worried and they haven't done so already, I guess I would suggest that they share the rewritten version with the prominent political philosopher to see what they think. At the very least, this may signal that the OP took their concerns to heart. But beyond this, I don't know.
What do other readers think?
Leave a Reply to MichelCancel reply