The Philosophers' Cocoon

A safe and supportive forum for philosophers.

Owned & Moderated by Marcus Arvan (University of Tampa)

Contact: marvan@ut.edu

Blog mission & moderation policy

IMPORTANT NOTE on how to ensure anonymity in commenting
Job-Market Reporting Thread (2025-26)
Job-Market Discussion Thread (2025-26)

recent posts

about

Can high-quality research offset a sparse academic CV?

In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a reader writes:

A couple years into my PhD program I got a serious illness and had to stop for a few years. I thankfully got better and decided to finish the PhD and am on track to get it in early 2026. Due to this, my academic CV is very empty, which makes me uncompetitive and I had assumed that I will need to look for a job outside of philosophy.

That being said, my research has now matured and I have been getting some very good feedback. My topic is high risk/high reward, and it’s looking like I have pulled it off and will be making a significant contribution to my area of study. I am now working on getting papers published and presenting at as many conferences/workshops as I can.

This has made me wonder if I might after all have a future in philosophy. So my question is, could high quality research possibly offset an otherwise quite empty academic CV in getting a job in philosophy? Or is that just not realistic, especially in this environment? Any insight or advice will be appreciated!

A number of years back I collected some informal data on job-placements and found that while publications seemed to be a strong predictor of hiring, a decent number of people got jobs (both postdocs and tenure-track jobs) with no publications. By and large, though, the people who did that seemed to come from top-ranked programs. Things may have changed since then, so it is hard to say for sure–but getting a job with no publications may be possible. Obviously, it’s also hard to estimate a person’s chances in any given case, as circumstances may differ, so I think there’s no way for the OP to really know without going on the market and seeing what happens. If I were in the OP’s position, I guess I’d try to go on the market while also doing my best to prepare for a Plan B outside of philosophy as a fallback (which seems like a prudent thing for most people to do–I wish I had!).

What do readers think?

Posted in

7 responses to “Can high-quality research offset a sparse academic CV?”

  1. Anonymous

    For most jobs, the VAST majority of applicants has high-quality research, and most of those who would be short-listed will have published some (or lots) of that research, often in the top journals. So it seems unlikely to lift your application among those who have published… unless (i) your letter writers can credibly argue that your not-yet published work is amazing, agenda-setting, deserves to land in the top journals, and/or (ii) you clearly are a great fit for other parts of a job (like its particular AOSs/AOCs, other teaching needs or the institutional mission, e.g.), and/or (iii) you come from a fancy top dept and so your Ivy-league/ top PGR PhD gives you credibility and status, and/or (iv) you get a leg up by offering some needed experience or diversity to the dept. Etc.

    Everyone (even the lucky ones with great publications) should have a plan B in this climate, so make sure you also think through those possibilities. Sometimes a plan B can end up being a better job/life than getting one of the coveted jobs you’re applying for anyway.

    Reply
  2. Michel

    FWIW, the earlier in your career you are, the less the sparseness matters. It’s hard to get interviews and jobs in the first place, so it’s common to spend several years on the market. So you may not have much luck in year one, but few do; but if your file improves, you may have more luck in years two, three, eight (!), etc.

    That’s not to say you should hold out forever, or turn down good alternatives. It’s just to say you don’t need to rule yourself out of contention, either.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Really sorry to say this, but imagine the committee sorting through 150 applications. Maybe your research is high quality. But to the search committee, so are the 149 other applicants. But they may be a bit unsure. They may say to themselves: 0-1 publications may be due to being lucky/unlucky. But the other person who has 3, 5, or 10 certainly can’t just simply be lucky. Why shouldn’t I go just go through the ones with many pubs? Maybe I shouldn’t, but I really don’t have time to give equal time to all the applicants, to carefully read through all their application packages.

    That being said, if your research is really of good quality, I think completing in 2026 may still give you sufficient time. Maybe you will meet responsible editors and reviewers, and have a few accepted before Autumn 2026. That may put you in a good position next round. And you may still have the round after that, as it is not uncommon for people to not find a job immediately after getting the degree. Assuming that you have 3-4 items almost ready to send out now, having almost 2 years seems hopeful to have enough items accepted to be hireable.

    Reply
  4. Anonymous

    It is hard to say without more detail. How far along are your papers? Are you on the market this year or next year? If you can pull off publishing a paper in a top journal when you hit the market, then you are all set. But if your papers are pending, then it would be prudent to wait a year (if you have funding at your PhD) or to have a backup plan. It is more likely to get a postdoc with fewer or no publications than a TT job. Postdocs in Europe are often tied to specific projects, so if your dissertation work is a good fit to the topic, then you would be more competitive without a publication. Then you can publish and write more paper while on your postdoc.

    Everyone needs a non-academic backup plan these days. The market is very tough in the humanities.

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    People should be planning for multiple years on the market, if they can manage doing so given other (e.g., family or financial) concerns. If you can do that, you have time to work on getting published.

    It is possible to get temporary positions with no publications. Moreover, while it’s much less common now, it is still possible to get jobs without publications, even when you aren’t from a high Gourmet rank program. I work at an R1 with a PhD program that is 30-40 rank. Last year, we hired someone with no publications coming out of a 40-50 Gourmet rank program. Their research was awesome. They also had very positive letters. I don’t think this is like impossibly rare, though it’s definitely not the most common circumstance.

    But a plan B is always a good idea.

    Reply
  6. Anonymous

    Another consideration is teaching. If your cv is bare of both teaching experience and publications, your letters of reference are going to have to do a lot of heavy lifting.

    If that’s the case, especially given the state of the job market, see if you can extend your time in grad school and get some teaching while you are getting some publications. Maybe you’ll be ready to defend in early 2026, but if you push it off till June, perhaps you can pick up a class or two either at your own institution or another nearby (try to make those arrangements right away).

    Conference presentations count for almost nothing in search committee deliberations, though perhaps they could be useful for networking and developing your ideas. (I’d say, don’t present at “as many as you can” but at the best two or maybe three.)

    BTW, in your cover letter you can explain (without giving details) that you stopped out of your program for health reasons for x months.

    Reply
  7. Anonymous

    A shift of perspective on this is that everyone who is finishing a graduate program is in a similar boat, with limited publications and courses taught. The fact that you took a gap in your program doesn’t change the total number of years you spend actively working on it, right? I guess the issue is more whether the perception of a gap in your academic record is a disadvantage. If you haven’t published at all yet, then the gap may not really be visible on your CV, so I don’t think it’s much to worry about – I would just not draw any attention to it. If the gap is visible on your CV (say, you published once 5 years ago), you can always just say that you took a medical leave, if anyone is concerned about it. People are weirder about this in the US, but in much of Europe, for instance, it’s common for people to even list career breaks on their CV, and there are legal protections for taking leaves for medical or parental reasons. I currently have multiple colleagues who have taken extended maternity leaves and nobody thought anything of it. I don’t want to assume the poster is American, but having grown up there and moved abroad, it’s a pretty troubling US mindset that having a period of illness signals the end of your career. So, I really hope the poster stays in academia if only to spite this ableist and capitalist mindset! For what it’s worth, I got my first postdoc with just one forthcoming publication, although I did have the great advantage of coming from one of the “prestigious” programs. Also, don’t forget that everyone who went thru their doctorate during covid likely experienced some sort of gappiness, whether or not this is visible on CVs.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading