In our November “how can we help you?” thread, a reader writes:

One of my papers has recently gotten a bunch of citations from non-philosophical articles in dubious journals that don’t have anything to do with (and don’t engage with) the paper. These fake citations now make up about a third of my citations on Google Scholar. I find this a bit annoying, partly because it makes the real citations harder to see, and partly because it just looks strange and unprofessional. In the worst case (though this seems unlikely), it could even raise implicit questions, since these kinds of citations can be bought. Has anyone else encountered this phenomenon, and is there anything that can be done about it?

I’ve never gone through my Google Scholar to look, but I expect that this sort of thing is common given the number of predatory journals out there and (baffling-to-me) willingness of some people to publish with them. I don’t know if there’s anything that can be done, given how systemic the issue probably is.

Do any readers have any helpful insights?

Posted in

2 responses to “Articles receiving citations in dubious journals?”

  1. Anonymous

    I’ve had this experience as well and I have no solution. It’d be great if Google opted to not include predatory journals in its count…

  2. Anonymous

    I wouldn’t worry about it. It reflects poorly on them, not you.

Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading