In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:
Is the readership consideration still relevant when choosing which generalist journal to submit to?
I know that in the past it used to be worthwhile to publish in journals that had more subscribers because you could expect more people to find your article when flipping through the pages of physical copies of the journal. Nowadays, from what I gather, most people only “browse” the specialist journals that are relevant to them, and no one opens up generalist journal websites casually looking for new stuff to read. Instead, people find stuff on depositories like PhilPapers with helpful search engines, and there isn’t really much a difference between journals aside from the prestige. Is this true?
I’m not sure–though I suspect as with most things there may be considerable variance in terms of people’s journal-reading practices.
Do any readers have helpful insights to share?
Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel reply