In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader writes:

May I ask what to do in this situation? Thanks! My paper has been with a prestigious journal since early January. The editor invited referees in two rounds, in February and March. In early June, I nudged the editor and they looked for referees for another round. It is now mid-July, and either no referee or fewer than two referees have been secured. My two questions:

(1) When would it be appropriate to inquire again? It is summer. People are busy. I do not want to annoy the editor. They appear willing to help but seem to be dealing with an overwhelming workload.

(2) When would you consider withdrawal? Withdrawing now in the summer seems also poorly timed. But at some point, I may have to consider it, given the job market pressure.

Some background information: the topic has a fairly decent number of philosophers currently working on it. The handling editor does not work in this field and may not know the right persons to ask, which may be a small contributing factor here.

Any input will be hugely appreciated!

What do readers think? Personally, unless the journal has already secured 1 referee and they are going to just require one review to reach a verdict, I think I’d probably withdraw at this point. 6 months just seems way too long to me for the paper to basically not be under full review.

Posted in

6 responses to “What to do when it’s been months and a journal hasn’t found referees?”

  1. Anonymous

    You might be making assumptions that are misguided. It is possible the editor has two reports from the first round and the verdict was split. The request for a referee in June may have been to find a third one to break the tie. If a referee was asked in late-June, say, it is far too early to expect a verdict.
    Further, you should in most instances not withdraw your paper. Let the process run its course. Starting over again may take a long time. Imagine, for example, that you withdraw your paper, submit it to another journal, and that journal asks the same referees who refereed the paper for the other journal. In all likelihood, they will decline to referee the paper. You can see where this is going …

    1. OP

      Thanks a lot! OP here. I made the assumption because in the EM system the status has remained “Reviewers Assigned” since February, while I believed the next stage should be “Under Review” should referees be found. But I just realized that those labels might not be consistent across systems. The second issue is one of my biggest worries.

    2. Let’s see what the river holds

      Unfortunately, I have to pass along this experience:

      I would not withdraw, but I would _consider_ sending an email saying that you may have to withdraw / are considering withdrawing. Post hoc ergo propter hoc, your mileage may vary, there are certainly counterexamples, etc., but I know of _multiple_ occasions where acceptance has _promptly_ followed such an email. It sucks.

  2. Anonymous

    I am sorry that you are under job market pressure and are going through this. But based on your description, I do *not* think you should withdraw.

    1. Marcus

      @Anonymous – Now that the situation has been clarified, I wholly agree.

      1. Anonymous

        Thank you! (from OP)

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading