In our September “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

We often talk about delays before acceptance: unresponsive editors, slow reviewers, and papers stuck in limbo. But how much variation is there once a paper is actually accepted?

A paper of mine was recently accepted by a reputable journal with a major publisher. Peer review took nearly a year, but I’ve now spent almost three months waiting for it to appear online. Proofs were delayed, and despite returning everything and signing the contract straight away, it has gone completely quiet.

When post-acceptance drags on like this, is the bottleneck typically with the journal’s editorial team or the publisher’s central production department?

I’d be curious to hear other people’s experiences, and whether there are noticeable differences between publishers and journals.

Do readers have any helpful insights to share?

Posted in

One response to “Post-acceptance publication delays?”

  1. Anonymous

    I’d be surprised if there’s an informative regularity here. I once had a paper drag on after acceptance due to the editor, once due to an open access form taking forever to process, and once due to a system glitch where my email address (which was correct for the pre-acceptance part of the editorial review process) somehow changed or was made incorrect for the production team. In the latter, they were waiting on me and I didn’t know it until I bugged them and they informed me that they’d emailed me several times.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading