The Philosophers' Cocoon

A safe and supportive forum for philosophers.

Owned & Moderated by Marcus Arvan (University of Tampa)

Contact: marvan@ut.edu

Blog mission & moderation policy

IMPORTANT NOTE on how to ensure anonymity in commenting
Job-Market Reporting Thread (2025-26)
Job-Market Discussion Thread (2026-27)

  1. When is it time to pull a paper and resubmit at a different journal. I’m a postdoctoral researcher. I’ve had…

recent posts

about

  • How can we help you? (May 2026)

    Now that it’s been a month since our last “how can we help you?” thread, it’s time for a new one.

    For those of you unfamiliar with this series, this is a chance for you to post openly or anonymously in the comments section below on anything you could use help with related to the profession. After you post your query in the comments, I will then post new threads for readers to discuss your query. 

    As usual, feel free to ask questions on anything (within the Cocoon’s mission) that you could use help with. Ask away – we’re here to help! 

    Finally, a quick reminder of the following RULE: Please do not submit replies to other comments in this thread. It makes these threads unwieldy and difficult for me to keep track of. If you’d like to respond to a comment in this thread, please wait until I dedicate a new post to the person’s query myself and comment in that thread instead! I have not been enforcing this rule consistently recently, but need to recommit to it as it has been hard to manage these threads. Thanks!

    32

  • Should reviewers suggest stylistic or structural changes?

    In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a journal reviewer asks:

    I would not appreciate my structural and stylistic suggestions to be used to reject a paper whose main argument I judged to be valuable. Is it better not to mention it altogether in an environment where many journals are aiming for ever higher rejection rates?

    Why not just say in your reviewer report, “I don’t think my stylistic/structural suggestions should be treated as a condition for the journal to publish the paper. However, I do think the paper would read better if the following changes were made…”?

    What do readers think?

    16

  • Is it important to have a personal website?

    In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I was wondering whether people would recommend having a personal academic website, perhaps using something like Google Sites or WordPress, or whether it is enough just to have a PhilPeople page.

    I’m currently a PhD student, and I’ve noticed that quite a lot of professors have their own websites, but quite a lot do not, so I’m not really sure whether having one is necessary. My main concern is whether it would make a meaningful difference on the job market after graduation. Do people think having a personal website is important, or is PhilPeople enough?

    What do readers think?

    7

  • The reputation of journals like Synthese?

    In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I’d like to know the recognition level of journals like Synthese. I saw that it’s ranked 11th in journal rankings, but unlike other journals, Synthese publishes a very large number of articles. I’d like to know how recognized this journal is for job hunting.

    My sense is that Synthese has a good reputation (commensurate with published surveys/renkings), and that it publishes a lot of excellent work. But, like the OP, I have also heard a few people note how many papers the journal publishes.

    Any thoughts from readers?

    38