In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

With PhD offers starting to come in, I wonder if people have thoughts on the degree to which offers are negotiable? If you have better funding from one school, are you able to use this to negotiate with another? Is this a common practice or frowned upon? And if it’s common, what works?

I haven't heard of this, and I'd be surprised if departments are given any leeway in terms of what they can offer students accepted to grad programs. 

Do any readers have helpful insights to share?

Posted in

10 responses to “Are PhD program offers negotiable?”

  1. my experience

    I had two very different experiences with trying to negotiate grad program offers. At one department I asked for better funding and was immediately offered significantly better funding. I had several other offers to choose from, so I continued to negotiate and was offered, in addition to another increase in funding, a course release. I believe this transpired because this school knew I had several other offers and there was a senior faculty member with a good deal of sway who wanted me as his student.
    I ended up declining that offer when I came off of the waiting list at a more highly ranked program. At this program I also asked very politely if I could have more funding. I was given a disdainful and haughty response that clearly conveyed the faculty member though the request was arrogant and inappropriate. I would have felt terrible about this had I not already had proof that negotiating was a wise and beneficial strategy. And at this program it was indeed impossible to negotiate, as all students did in fact receive equal stipends.
    The lesson is: it depends completely on the institution. You cannot know what the parameters are ahead of time. You should probably attempt to negotiate, especially if you are otherwise in a position to do so. And don’t let anyone make you feel bad because negotiating does frequently result in better funding. You are hardly in a lucrative career and these increases are very well deserved if you can secure them.
    Good luck!

  2. Grad Student

    I have heard of a handful of successful negotiations. It is definitely a real thing and it sometimes pays off.
    In general, I do not think you should expect it to work, and you may want to avoid it in cases where you don’t think you’re a priority for the program; however, if you do feel you are a priority for the program, I think it’s a good idea.
    Of note: I think schools with strong grad student unions will probably have good stipends anyway, and will also be less likely to have much more than the base offer for you.

  3. anon

    People regularly negotiated and got more at the institution I went to. Some ideas about what to ask for: rather than just your net yearly number, there’s also travel funding. There’s also how much teaching you do versus how much is pure “fellowship” – you can try to get less teaching per year for the same net income, or try to get more pure fellowship years.
    Just ask in a way that is polite, and sensitive to the fact that some programs don’t have enough money / autonomy to be flexible in this way. (As “my experience” notes above, some faculty members are very quick to generalize from their university’s practices to all university’s practices, which I find weird of those faculty members to do, but shrug.)

  4. Not recommended

    The R1 institution where I work strictly enforces the policy of giving all graduate students the same stipend to avoid competition and foster community. My alma mater (also an R1) did the same. Negotiations would be useless in these cases.

  5. Grad Student

    Yes, some institutions have a strict policy against differences in grad salary.
    That’s fine. They tend to make that public.
    If you apply to UCSD, for example, you should know that they have this policy (afaik).
    But that doesn’t mean it isn’t generally possible, or even a good idea, to negotiate in some cases.

  6. Anon

    on my visits, I was told by advanced graduate students that the stipend was negotiable. I would recommend asking those more advanced in the program what their experience was before negotiating.

  7. Chris

    Where I work, the grad offers are usually the same, but sometimes faculty have grants that can provide additional funding to students who work in different areas. For example, if I hadn’t known better (given what “Grad student” says), I would’ve guessed UCSD might be a school where you could negotiate, or where not all graduate students received the same funding. For example, Eddy Chen has a big grant – I would’ve guessed at least a bit of this money could go to graduate students. If so, then some graduate students (say, working in phil physics), might be able to get a bit of this money to work as a research assistant or some such based on Chen’s grant. But I’m just using this as an example – I have no idea if the grant does or doesn’t fund graduate students and have no idea if what Grad Student says is true; the point is that faculty with grants are often a source of extra money for graduate students, which can sometimes be negotiated. It can’t hurt to ask (nicely).

  8. sahpa

    Asking grad students at that department is wise. Also, figure out if they are unionized; if they are, then negotiation (that they find out about) is likely to come across badly and anti-solidary.

  9. hierarchical

    definitely ask if you have an offer with higher stipend at a higher ranked program but you are still genuinely deliberating. It is almost always well received and frequently results in a higher stipend (whether it’s from school or extra fund).
    Might still worth trying if one of the two applies (higher ranked, or higher stipend), as in OP’s situation. But be prepared for a no, which is likely.

  10. Assistant Professor

    Agree with what others have said about differences in programs, the role of unions, and the ways negotiations may work or come across. I’ll just add that one thing that can be effective if you have multiple offers you are seriously considering is telling a program what financial considerations you are weighing (without directly asking for something) and just see what, if anything, they say in response.
    One program where I had an offer told me explicitly they didn’t negotiate for reasons of fairness. Another didn’t offer health insurance and I told them this was a problem and they agreed and asked that if I turned them down to put it in writing that this was a factor so they could use it to communicate with their administration. I went to a program that on paper offered the same amount of funding and benefits to everyone but in practice had a variety of grants and tools to get some folks additional funding (that other folks didn’t know anything about and when they learned about it sometimes deeply resented).

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading