• In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I’m a PhD student in the US. I was supposed to go on the market last year, but unfortunately developed a very serious health condition, for which I’ve been receiving treatment (lots of surgery etc). I’ve basically been fully off work for the last 12 months, although I’ve stayed enrolled as a student for visa / health insurance reasons (fortunately my department has been very understanding). My condition is stable, so I’m hoping to apply for jobs this Fall.

    I’m wondering if people have advice on whether to disclose this leave of absence to hiring committees / ask my letter writers to mention it? On the one hand, I want to explain why I’ve been so unproductive in the last year. I would also require some disability-related accommodations if I was offered a flyout. On the other hand, I don’t want departments to see my health as a risk to my productivity going forward, especially since it probably is(!) — the situation is unfortunately still very uncertain, and will require at least three more major surgeries in the next couple of years.

    I would welcome all thoughts, especially from those doing the hiring! I’m also curious to hear from other people who’ve been through prolonged medical sagas at this stage of their careers.

    Do any readers have any helpful insights or experiences to share?

    8
  • In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I’m currently a PhD student at a PGR top-15 department. Given the current job market situation, I’m wondering what a realistic publication record should look like by the time I graduate. Roughly how many journal publications would be enough to be competitive? I already have one paper published in Synthese. My minimum hope is to secure a postdoc, though of course a tenure-track job would be ideal. What should I aim for from here?

    What do readers think?

    30
  • In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    Do conferences matter at all on the job market? I’m a grad student and I feel like I hear such a wide range of perspectives on this topic. Some people say they’re important, but only for practicing giving talks and networking, some people say it’s a red flag if an applicant has no conferences but not a “plus” if they do, and others seem to think that some of the fancier conferences are a boost. Part of the rationale for this question is that I’ve definitely been encouraged to put a lot of effort into applying for and attending conferences, and I’m wondering if this is a good use of one’s time as a grad student.

    Another reader seconded the query:

    I’ve been wondering about this too! I’d also like to know what “level” of conference is considered enough. Are graduate conferences sufficient? And are big, crowded conferences like the APA meetings or the Joint Session actually helpful for the job market?

    I could be wrong, but my sense is that–perhaps with a few special exceptions–conference presentations matter very little (if at all) as an item on one’s CV. When it comes to research, my sense is that committees care vastly more about publications, the writing sample, and (in some cases) recommendation letters. This isn’t to say that conference presentations aren’t important, however. I think they are. They can be a great way to get feedback on one’s work, practice giving talks–and yes, networking can be important on the market. But these are just my thoughts.

    What do readers think?

    21
  • Now that it’s been a month since our last “how can we help you?” thread, it’s time for a new one.

    For those of you unfamiliar with this series, this is a chance for you to post openly or anonymously in the comments section below on anything you could use help with related to the profession. After you post your query in the comments, I will then post new threads for readers to discuss your query. 

    As usual, feel free to ask questions on anything (within the Cocoon’s mission) that you could use help with. Ask away – we’re here to help! 

    Finally, a quick reminder of the following RULE: Please do not submit replies to other comments in this thread. It makes these threads unwieldy and difficult for me to keep track of. If you’d like to respond to a comment in this thread, please wait until I dedicate a new post to the person’s query myself and comment in that thread instead! I have not been enforcing this rule consistently recently, but need to recommit to it as it has been hard to manage these threads. Thanks!

    15