• In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

    I'm a new grad student, and I'm wondering about the use of mathematical symbols like φ or Δ in analytic philosophy, like when papers say things like "for some proposition p that holds a disposition d to do φ under circumstances c…"

    Is there an agreed-upon set of industry standards for when to use what symbol, or is it totally up to you? I've noticed that people like to use "w" for worlds, for example – is that a standard that you'll get frowned on for violating, or is it just easy to remember?

    I do think using w is expected in the possible worlds case, but I'm not sure what other norms there are.

    What do readers think?

    3
  • In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

    Are postdoc salaries negotiable? I'm thinking in particular of European postdocs funded by the ERC, where the PI might have some leeway over allocation of funds, but I'm also wondering in general if postdoc or even VAP salaries are negotiable (and are negotiations expected) in the same way that TT salaries are.

    No idea! Any readers have inside insights?

    12
  • In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

    Sometimes when I quote a passage from another philosopher, I'd like to remove a paragraph break without removing any words. How does one indicate this? I feel like both using and not using an ellipsis would be misleading.

    Hmm…whenever I block quote long passages, I always leave in a paragraph break. But in cases where I'm merely quoting within the regular body text, I guess I think separating the relevant passages sort of "[like]" I am "[doing here]" is the way to go (as putting in an ellipsis sort of suggests a continuity of passages to me that doesn't exist across passages in different paragraphs. But maybe I'm overthinking things.

    What do readers think?

    7
  • In our most recent "how can we help you?" thread, a reader asks:

    People say journals are a crapshoot but is there a way of getting lucky with journals that's not just pure chance? I feel I've been extra lucky with top journals, even with papers that I thought weren't as good. Maybe I sound like someone with imposter syndrome but I'm wondering if people google the paper title and decide to greenlight my paper because they like me as a person.

    What do readers think? 

    25