• In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I promised a paper of mine to a collection that is supposed to be published by a good (but not tippy-top) press. Well, several years have passed, and the collection still hasn’t appeared, nor have there been any announcements about when it’s expected to be published, as far as I’m aware. The editors have also been largely unresponsive the few times that I’ve asked them for updates. Recently, though, one of the editors told me that it will come out later this year. But as it’s November and none of the contributors has heard anything about it, this prediction seems questionable, too, and I worry that we’re being strung along. At the same time, the editors are still listing the collection on their academic webpages, so it’s not entirely clear what’s going on.

    What should I do? Should I withdraw the paper (or make clear that withdrawal is very much on the table unless there’s meaningful movement)? I’m early-career and on the tenure track, and while having this paper published won’t make or break my case for tenure, I’d still prefer that it be published, either in this collection or elsewhere, given how long it’s been since it was first written.

    My sense is that this sort of thing seems to be common. I’ve come across people reporting similar things on social media on a number of occasions, and I suspect it is often because those editing the volume have trouble getting everyone to get their chapters in–which can string things out for a long time (especially if authors they need for the volume keep stalling/asking for extensions). Anyway, as to what to do, I guess if it were me I’d stick tight at least to the end of the year and then maybe reasess.

    What do readers think? Any helpful tips or experiences to share?

    6
  • In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    If a job is advertised as an assistant professorship, tenure track, is there any room for them to hire an associate professor with tenure? A job in the U.K. was advertised that is exactly my specialty. I’m an associate professor with tenure, and I’d be interested in working at that university, only I’m not willing to give up tenure. Is it even within the realm of possibility that they could hire me with tenure, or once the job is advertised a certain way, as only tenure track, does it need to stay that way? Thanks in advance for your help.

    My experience is that the answer generally seems to be “no”, but I don’t know if exceptions are ever made, and if so, how common it is.

    Do any readers have any helpful insights or experiences to share?

    7
  • Now that it’s November, it’s time for a new “how can we help you?” thread.

    For those of you unfamiliar with this series, this is a chance for you to post openly or anonymously in the comments section below on anything you could use help with related to the profession. After you post your query in the comments section, I will then post new threads for readers to discuss your query. 

    As usual, feel free to ask questions on anything (within the Cocoon’s mission) that you could use help with, including but not limited to:

    • The job-market (applying for jobs, etc.)
    • Issues in the profession (including issues of social justice)
    • Graduate school
    • Publishing
    • Teaching
    • Work-life balance
    • Mental health & well-being
    • Professional or personal struggles
    • Etc.

    Ask away – we’re here to help! 

    Finally, a quick reminder of the following RULE: Please do not submit replies to other comments in this thread. It makes these threads unwieldy and difficult for me to keep track of which queries I’ve posted new threads on. If you’d like to respond to a comment in this thread, please wait until I dedicate a new post to the person’s query myself and comment in that thread instead!

    64
  • In our newest “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

    I really like one of my analysis papers, but it is obviously short. I have other papers that can serve as writing sample, but in less either in “prestigious” venues (whatever that may mean) or co-authored. So would an analysis paper put me into some disadvantages?

    Good question, though I’m not sure one can judge without looking at the paper itself. On the one hand, Analysis is a highly-regarded journal. Short papers can also obviously be rigorous, inventive, and make important contributions to the field (Ed Gettier’s famous 3-page Analysis paper against the JTB theory of knowledge being the most obvious example). On the other hand, short papers tend to be less ambitious than longer papers, and depending on the paper I could imagine search committee members potentially wanting something more substantial. Finally, though, if one has published other things, there’s nothing preventing from looking up and reading your other work. All in all, I guess I’m inclined to think using the Analysis piece is fine, and probably advantageous, given that it’s an excellent venue and probably excellent work. But this is also just a guess, I guess. 😉

    What do other readers think?

    6