In our new “how can we help you?” thread, a reader asks:

I promised a paper of mine to a collection that is supposed to be published by a good (but not tippy-top) press. Well, several years have passed, and the collection still hasn’t appeared, nor have there been any announcements about when it’s expected to be published, as far as I’m aware. The editors have also been largely unresponsive the few times that I’ve asked them for updates. Recently, though, one of the editors told me that it will come out later this year. But as it’s November and none of the contributors has heard anything about it, this prediction seems questionable, too, and I worry that we’re being strung along. At the same time, the editors are still listing the collection on their academic webpages, so it’s not entirely clear what’s going on.

What should I do? Should I withdraw the paper (or make clear that withdrawal is very much on the table unless there’s meaningful movement)? I’m early-career and on the tenure track, and while having this paper published won’t make or break my case for tenure, I’d still prefer that it be published, either in this collection or elsewhere, given how long it’s been since it was first written.

My sense is that this sort of thing seems to be common. I’ve come across people reporting similar things on social media on a number of occasions, and I suspect it is often because those editing the volume have trouble getting everyone to get their chapters in–which can string things out for a long time (especially if authors they need for the volume keep stalling/asking for extensions). Anyway, as to what to do, I guess if it were me I’d stick tight at least to the end of the year and then maybe reasess.

What do readers think? Any helpful tips or experiences to share?

Posted in

6 responses to “When you have a chapter slated for an edited volume in limbo for years?”

  1. AGT

    It does depend how long the OP has been waiting. And the other major question is whether the chapter material is on a level that it would be published in a good journal. If so, then I’d seriously consider withdrawing if the OP has been waiting for a long time. But I would first try to talk the editors, not in email, but in person (online or offline) to gauge what really is going on. I see no reason why one cannot be honest in this situation: just ask them what is going on and tell them that you are considering withdrawing the chapter. See what they to that..

  2. Kapto

    I would get the editors to email you a confirmation that your contribution has been accepted (by them) for publication. This is enough for most university promotion reviewers to count the article as a publication. Then post it on your own pages as forthcoming, and feel free to publicize it anywhere and everywhere. These days that’s a more reliable way to get it read by others than releasing it in a hard copy print form, anyway.

    I don’t see any reason to doubt it will be published eventually — these things really do take a few years sometimes — so why lose a publication you’ve already secured?

    1. Marcus

      I second this!

  3. Some sleuthing first

    This is very common. I have a book chapter coming out in February, and the conference that spawned the collection was ten years ago. My view has been that it’s better to know you have a venue for a paper rather than jump through hoops with journals hoping you can find a place for it. Before you reach out to the editors, you can check on a few things. Do you have a contract or have you received proofs? If so, it means it should go to press. Have you Googled the book title? If it shows up on the press’s website or Amazon, then you’ll know the publication date. You could also just follow up with the editors and ask for clarification, especially given that you’re building up your tenure file. Good luck!

  4. In addition to what people have said, you can also just post a preprint on PhilPapers if you want people to discover it!

  5. Anonymous

    I am currently editing a volume with a few colleagues. These things take time, and just a few delayed contributors can set the project back half a year or more. I have done edited volumes in the past, and I have even had to cut uncooperative contributors. It is a tough job.
    You say it won’t make a difference for your tenure case. Well, then just let it be. If you pull out it is quite likely that the editors will never invite you again (for anything, ever).
    I had your experience early in my career, as well, even before I landed a TT job. the volume took 5 or 6 years to come out. I thought my paper was a very important paper, at the time. It has been cited only 12 times – I have 20 papers that have been cited 50 or more times. That paper is of little consequence, and it was published in an OUP volume.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Philosophers' Cocoon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading